Synap vs Roam Research

The graph evolved.

Roam Research pioneered bi-directional linking and the idea of a “networked thought” tool. It changed how a generation takes notes. Synap takes the graph further: typed records, structure on capture, many views, and data you actually own.

Get started Pricing

Synap and Roam Research, side by side

Synap compared with Roam Research
Topic	Roam Research	Synap
Graph	Text pages and blocks, untyped links	Typed records with typed relationships
Organization	Manual [[page references]]	Structure made from raw input, proposed to you
Views	Daily page, outline, graph	Graph, board, table, calendar and more
Price	$15/month, or $500 for Believer	€20/month managed, or self-host free
Hosting	SaaS only — no self-hosting	A dedicated PostgreSQL pod you own

Structuring on capture is part of Pod + AI (€100/month). On the Pod plan (€20/month), the agent you connect does the structuring through Synap's tools. Either way, changes arrive as proposals you review.

Where Roam Research is strong

Pioneered bi-directional linking
Block-level references

Where they differ

Text graph vs. typed graph

Roam's graph is made of text. Pages link to pages; blocks reference blocks. The connections help you explore thoughts, but they carry no type. A link between a person and a project looks the same as a link between two random notes. You can't query “all contacts at Company X”, because contacts don't exist as a concept — they're pages with a name.

Synap's graph is made of typed records. A contact has an email, phone, and company. A deal has a stage, value, and close date. Relationships are typed too: a contact “works at” a company, a task “belongs to” a project. That makes the graph queryable, viewable, and meaningful at scale.

Beyond the graph view

Roam has essentially one view: the daily page, an outline with bi-directional links. There's a graph visualization, but at scale it becomes an unreadable hairball.

Synap renders the same records in the shape the task needs. Managing a pipeline? A board. Planning your week? A calendar. Analyzing data? A table. Exploring connections? A graph — a meaningful one, because the nodes are typed records, not anonymous text.

The cost of standing still

Roam was revolutionary in 2020, but development has slowed markedly. It added no structuring on capture, no model choice, and no structured record system. The price remains $15/month (or $500 for the “Believer” plan), with no self-hosting option.

Synap is built for working with agents from the ground up. Your agent structures the data; proposals keep every change visible; any agent can connect; your data lives on a dedicated PostgreSQL pod you own.

Common questions

How is Synap different from Roam Research?

Roam Research is a networked thought tool — everything is an outline with bi-directional links you create by hand. Synap builds the graph for you: records and relationships are detected in everything you capture, without manual [[page references]]. Synap also stores data on a dedicated server you own, while Roam uses its cloud.

Is Synap a Roam Research alternative?

Yes. If you've used Roam for its knowledge graph and daily notes but found the manual linking overhead too high, Synap takes that work off your hands. It also adds board, table and calendar views beyond Roam's outline — over the same underlying graph.

Can I import my Roam graph into Synap?

Export your Roam graph as Markdown or JSON. An agent connected to your pod, such as Claude Code, can read those files and write them into Synap as typed records, with links and properties. Each write arrives as a proposal you review, so nothing lands in your pod unseen.

The next generation of networked thought.

Get started All comparisons